(Page 2 of 2)
The standard crown procedure involves a couple of anesthetized
hours during which the dentist drills away 30 percent of a tooth,
takes an impression and cements on a temporary crown. Then there is
usually a two-week wait for a lab to produce the crown, and another
afternoon of numbness and drilling when it is attached.
Cerec, enhanced by a new 3-D software package introduced earlier
this year by Sirona, lets dentists preserve more of the original
tooth structure and create a crown while you wait.
For Michele Shafer, whose home is an hour and fifteen minutes
from Dr. Spector's office, that meant making only a single trip for
a crown; she spent more time in her car than in the chair.
Dr. Spector began Mrs. Shafer's procedure with an injection of
anesthetic through a digital syringe that slows the flow of
medication when it senses pressure, thereby making the injection
almost painless. He used the Cerec infrared camera to create an
optical impression of the original tooth. That step replaces the
green paste and uncomfortable metal trays that are typically used to
make an impression.
Dr. Spector then removed the diseased tissue and took a second
image, which the Cerec combined with the first to create a rough 3-D
model of the crown on the screen. Using a trackball, he tweaked the
design, smoothing contours and adjusting the fit. He then sent the
data to the milling chamber, which produced the crown in 17 minutes.
Not only is the process more convenient than waiting for the lab,
Dr. Spector said, it also produces a stronger crown. Instead of
enamel, the crown is made of compressed porcelain "40 percent
stronger than what a lab can press," he said. "And the material has
the same properties as enamel - it wears away at the same rate, and
it has the same thermal coefficient, so when you drink hot coffee it
will expand just as much as the teeth around it." It leaves more of
the original tooth intact because the material can be cemented
directly to the tooth with no metal interlayer.
"No one loves getting a crown," said Dr. Jeffrey Katz, a San
Francisco dentist. "They hate the Novocain. They hate the gooey
stuff. This transforms the whole experience."
"The biggest thing for me is the control," said Dr. George
Maryniuk, a prosthodontist in Brookline, Mass. "My father was a lab
technician, and I have high expectations. Now I'm guaranteed to get
the results I want."
But with its $100,000 price tag, the Cerec does not make sense
for every practice. The math works out for Dr. Maryniuk, who was
paying $5,000 a month in lab expenses, most of which Cerec
eliminated, and now pays $2,000 a month to the Cerec leasing
company. The machine reduces his costs for a crown, for example, to
$30 from the usual $200 and saves him the expense of second
appointments.
That savings will have no effect on the patient's pocketbook,
because dentists depend on the margin to cover their Cerec payments
and the other myriad overhead costs of a high-tech office. For
instance, a digital X-ray machine costs some $18,000, compared with
about $4,500 for a conventional one, but dentists don't charge any
more for the service, and insurance companies don't make a
distinction.
"When I get a claim form for a crown, I don't know if it was
lab-processed or Cerec," said Max Anderson, the national oral health
advisor for Delta Dental, one of the nation's largest insurers. In
the system, a crown is a crown. Most insurers don't even cover new
diagnostic services like the Difoti, meaning that the dentist must
somehow absorb the $6,495 cost.
So dentists must analyze their needs before investing in the
machines. A dentist who does few crowns or other restorations might
be better off sticking with the labs, many of which are starting to
use the Cerec technology. In any case, in an already
capital-intensive business, the new devices put pressure on the
bottom line.
That in turn could be leading to some unnecessary treatments.
"The question is, does a dentist make the same clinical decisions
when he has a $20,000 machine to pay off," Dr. Anderson
cautioned.
Aided by their digital cameras, Dr. Feuerstein said, some
dentists are selling cosmetic procedures that they might not have
suggested before. "It's like the extreme makeover reality shows," he
said. "Dentists will take a patient with 'ugly' teeth and show them
what they could look like with facades and laser-shaped gums."
On balance, most dentists view the new dental technologies as a
positive force. "Today, cavities are a universal disease," said Dr.
Frederick C. Eichmiller, director of the Paffenbarger Research
Center of the American Dental Association. "In the future, it won't
be." Dr. Eichmiller and his team in Gaithersburg, Md., are
developing toothpastes and rinses that will help teeth repair
themselves, as skin or bones do. They are also working on "smart
fillings" that will detect decay and release a healing mixture of
minerals.
What will that mean for the high-tech dentist? "Remember," Dr.
Katz said, "the goal of dentistry is to put ourselves out of
business."
Correction: Sept. 6, 2003, Saturday
An article in Circuits on Thursday referred imprecisely to a
high-tech dental tool, Cerec, which is used to create crowns. Its
basic technology was developed in the early 1980's, and a machine on
which it is used in many dentists' offices, the Cerec 3, has existed
since 2000; Cerec 3D is the latest software for it, introduced this
year.